Kira Pavlova vs Qianhui Tang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Pavlova vs Q. Tang

Kira Pavlova
RUS
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
21
Age
25
-
Height
-
430
C. Rank
818
353
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$1.9K
-
Plays
-

Qianhui Tang
CHN
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
21
Age
25
-
Height
-
430
C. Rank
818
353
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$1.9K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Pavlova 2 - 0 Tang
They have played 4 sets in total, with Kira Pavlova winning 4 and Qianhui Tang winning 0. The last match between Kira Pavlova and Qianhui Tang was at the W100 Incheon, 01-09-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kira Pavlova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pavlova | 2 |
| Tang | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W100 Incheon(09-01-24)
Kira Pavlova
6
6
Qianhui Tang
4
2
(R1) W35 Kunshan(08-21-24)
Kira Pavlova
6
6
Qianhui Tang
1
2
K. Pavlova vs Q. Tang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,860 |
| 55.74% (131-104) | Career Total W/L | 49.13% (85-88) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Pavlova vs Q. Tang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kira Pavlova has won 36.33% of points on their second serve, while Qianhui Tang has won 35.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kira Pavlova, in recent form, has won 48.70% of their opponent's second serve points, while Qianhui Tang has won 48.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.76% and 31.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kira Pavlova has saved 43.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Qianhui Tang has saved 43.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kira Pavlova has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 34/30), with Qianhui Tang winning 27.27% (W/L 3/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kira Pavlova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 17/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Qianhui Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 66/64), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 15/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Kira Pavlova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 24/27), where as Qianhui Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kira Pavlova winning 2 times and Qianhui Tang being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kira Pavlova winning 4 and Qianhui Tang winning 0.
- The last match between Kira Pavlova and Qianhui Tang was at the W100 Incheon, 01-09-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kira Pavlova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kira Pavlova has played against opponents with an average rank of 197 while Qianhui Tang has played against players with an average rank of 275.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kira Pavlova has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Qianhui Tang has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kira Pavlova has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Qianhui Tang has converted 35.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kira Pavlova vs Qianhui Tang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Pavlova vs Q. Tang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:28:30 | Average Match Time | 1:28:30 |
| 64% (62/97) | 1st Serve % | 64% (79/123) |
| 66% (41/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (33/79) |
| 60% (21/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (17/44) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 59% (73/123) | Return Points Win % | 36% (35/97) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pavlova 44%, Tang 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pavlova 58%, Tang 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Pavlova 51%, Tang 49%.
K. Pavlova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-2 ret. | ||
SF | L | 5-1 ret. | ||
QF | W | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q. Tang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | ||

K. Pavlova vs Q. Tang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.74% (131/104) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.13% (85/88) |
| 55.53% (296/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.50% (202/198) |
| 52.70% (2510/2253) | Games Win/Loss | 51.62% (1877/1759) |
| 55.94% (113/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.77% (66/64) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 91 | Aces Total | 196 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1006 | Total Double Faults | 329 |
| 1:31:46 | Average Match Time | 1:10:33 |
| 176.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.31 |
| 60% (8317/13841) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5056/7976) |
| 59% (4893/8317) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2981/5056) |
| 43% (2391/5524) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1258/2920) |
| 52% (1019/1950) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (487/1042) |
| 49% (6880/13910) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3769/8143) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 54.65% (94/78) | Challenger W/L | 48.28% (56/60) |
| 59.68% (37/25) | Futures W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 56% (129/230) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (84/169) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 69% (20/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 47% (32/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 88% (135/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (93/73) |
| 12% (135/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (93/20) |
| 12% (100/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (80/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:20 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico